false
Catalog
Carpal Fractures -Scaphoid and Other Carpal Fractu ...
Conservative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic-Assiste ...
Conservative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic-Assisted Screw Fixation of Scaphoid Waist Fractures—A Randomized Trial With Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up
Back to course
Pdf Summary
In this randomized trial, the authors evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative treatment versus arthroscopic-assisted screw fixation of acute non- or minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures. The study included 38 patients who were either treated conservatively with a thumb spica cast or underwent surgical treatment consisting of arthroscopy and percutaneous antegrade screw fixation. The patients were followed for a median of 6 years.<br /><br />At 26 weeks, the conservatively treated group had better range of motion and had almost normal values compared to the contralateral wrist. There were no significant differences between the two groups in grip or pinch strength at any measurement point. At the 6-year follow-up, radiographic signs of arthritis in the radioscaphoid joint were more common in the surgically treated group compared to the conservative group.<br /><br />The study concludes that non- and minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures are best treated conservatively. Although surgical treatment may provide improved short-term functional outcomes, it carries a possible increased risk of long-term arthritis. The authors recommend conservative treatment as the first choice for these types of fractures, with arthroscopic-assisted screw fixation reserved for patients who require a quick return to work or sport activities. It is important to note that this study had a small sample size and further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Keywords
randomized trial
conservative treatment
arthroscopic-assisted screw fixation
scaphoid waist fractures
thumb spica cast
surgical treatment
range of motion
grip strength
6-year follow-up
arthritis
×
Please select your language
1
English